Essays

Everyone Is a Master of Suspicion Now: Arendt and Latour on Modern Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Political Judgement

Authors

  • Joren Cliquet Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.45.2.42339

Keywords:

Arendt, Bruno Latour, Critique, Political Judgement, Conspiracy

Abstract

Bruno Latour polemicized against critique’s supposed congruence with conspiracy thinking. Both treat reality as a mere front for the real forces behind it. Latour argues that ‘critique’ must break with these reductionist and foundationalist thinking practices. I argue with Arendt that Latour misses his mark: not ‘critique’, but the modern way of understanding reality as such is guilty of this reductionism. I claim that this calls for a shift of perspective to the problem of the atrophying of political judgement. Instead of being able to move within a historical space of ideas, we have all become alienated masters of suspicion.

Author Biography

Joren Cliquet, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL)

Joren Cliquet obtained master’s degrees in Economics and Philosophy from the University of Leuven (KUL),
Belgium, as well as a research master’s degree in Philosophy from that same university. His research interests are (the Marxist critique of) Political Economy, (Frankfurt School) Critical Theory, and theories of political judgement (recently linked to ‘Political Epistemology’). These interests culminate in the specific research interest of how to conceptualise, represent, and criticise capitalism.

Published

2026-04-07

How to Cite

Cliquet, Joren. 2026. “Everyone Is a Master of Suspicion Now: Arendt and Latour on Modern Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Political Judgement”. Krisis | Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 45 (2): 24-33. https://doi.org/10.21827/krisis.45.2.42339.

Issue

Section

Essays