192
Said’s intellectual endeavours by clarifying misreadings of his diverse bibliographies, high-
lighting Said’s remarkable dedication to the classics of Western philosophy.
From Brennan’s perspective, Said’s work is a powerful illustration of how theoretical perspec-
tives heavily influenced by personal experience may be utilized to critique prevailing cultural
narratives. Emphasizing Said’s role as a public intellectual deeply committed to political and
social justice, Brennan points out that his legacy continues to influence current discussions
about cultural representation, power, and resistance. To get acquainted with Said’s intellectual
trajectory, Brennan takes the readers through his identity crisis, how he extracted his whole
philosophy from the issue of his exile, and how his blurring identity led him to deconstruct it.
Born in Jerusalem and raised in Cairo, Said comes from the geographical intersection of the
West and the East. With the greatest load of monotheistic absolutism and religious rites, his
origins heavily influenced his academic interests. Brennan densely depicts Said’s early years
in the United States, describing how he struggled to overcome the alienation he faced in the
country despite inheriting an American passport on the grounds of his father’s citizenship.
Said could not stop thinking about the stereotypes of the Orient in mainstream popular culture,
especially after visiting California for the first time at thirty-three. The book widely discusses
the issue of exile in Said’s life, which was one of his enduring intellectual concerns. His overall
analytical disposition was formed by exilic consciousness. Said saw the intellectual exile as
playing a vital role in contemporary culture. Being dependent on the East and the West and
feeling estranged from both, he perceived them as notions that work to construct an ideology
rather than an indication of geographical reality. By examining Said’s psychological and tem-
peramental dimensions, Brennan demonstrates how exile consciously and subconsciously
formed his identity. Said employs exile as a euphemism for his dialectical approach. For him,
the sense of meaning uprooted is more than just a tragic destiny bestowed upon him; the con-
cept of exile encapsulates Said’s sense of freedom. As Brennan formulates, an exile for Said
was “about being odd, awkward, and at home nowhere.”
The book reveals much information on how literary theory inspired Said’s thoughts. According
to his friend, Palestinian historian Tarif Khalidi, he was at his heart “a philosopher who had
migrated into literature.” Said’s thirst for poetry and his long-term research in history were
never literally addressed in his existing literature. Still, they were essential in the early years