Dear reader, contributor, friend,
With New Year’s Eve around the bend, Krisis is delighted to share something old and something new. Our latest issues have already been published on our revamped online platform; in addition, we have been transferring our prior digitized issues over the past few months to make our old issues available. Today, it is our great pleasure to announce the completion of this digital transfer. To celebrate the accessibility of our archive, we pre-publish a piece from our upcoming new issue, in which our editorial member Thijs Lijster interviews Boris Groys, whose work Über das Neue enjoys its 25th anniversary this year.
Krisis still is a completely independent online journal, without any ties to big publication companies and factories of knowledge. This independence means that we remain dependent on your donations. Although Krisis is a non-profit enterprise, we are in need of a small annual budget for our platform to stay afloat. To keep the quality of our contributions as high as possible, Krisis works with a paid editorial assistant and a paid proofreader (while the editorial board is happy to self-exploit). Without your donation, Krisis cannot subsist. Therefore, we hope that you – reader, contributor, supporter – are willing to donate a small (or larger) amount to Krisis to secure our financial future: we need you! Donations can be sent directly to our bank account at IBAN NL33INGB0005172630.
Our entire editorial board wishes you a brilliant 2018!
With contributions from:
While super-hurricane climate and super-offensive politicians are tying up news headlines, the new issue of Krisis brings together philosophical perspectives on urgent political issues. Joost Leuven analyses the role of theory in contemporary animal rights advocacy and argues as to why the articulation of philosophical theory should be an intrinsic aspect of the practice of advocacy. With similar exigency, Michiel Bot’s work focuses on the case of Dutch politician Geert Wilders’s employment of ‘giving and taking offense’ and demonstrates the enduring salience of Adorno and Marcuse for the 21st century. The article by Pieter Lemmens and Yuk Hui focusses on two philosophers that have recently waded into the discussion of the Anthropocene, Stiegler and Sloterdijk, and explores their Heideggerian inheritance. This exploration prompts serious questions as to whether Stiegler and Sloterdijk have convincing answers to the Anthropocene’s moral and political challenges.
In addition, Rob Ritzen interviews philosopher Chiara Bottici, author of A Philosophy of Political Myth and Imaginal Politics. As part of our review section, Sudeep Dasgupta considers Gloria Wekker’s book White Innocence against the backdrop of current politics of race, Matthijs Kouw presents the Dutch geophilosophical work Water by René ten Bos, and Temi Ogunye reviews Alejandra Mancilla’s cosmopolitan exploration of The Right of Necessity. Finally, Marc Tuters discusses Alberto Toscano and Jeff Kinkle’s Cartographies of the Absolute in relation to Fredric Jameson’s legacy.
With contributions from:
Michiel Bot, Yuk Hui, Pieter Lemmens, Joost Leuven, Rob Ritzen, Chiara Bottici, Temi Ogunye, Marc Tuters, Matthijs Kouw and Sudeep Dasgupta
Elements of Anti-Islam Populism: Critiquing Geert Wilders’ Politics of Offense with Marcuse and Adorno
Reframing the Technosphere: Peter Sloterdijk and Bernard Stiegler’s Anthropotechnological Diagnoses of the Anthropocene
The Theory and Practice of Contemporary Animal Rights Activism
Imaginal Interventions: An Interview with Chiara Bottici
Can the Right of Necessity Be Both Personal and Political?
Dialectics of Secular Revelation: Jameson’s Cognitive Mapping Aesthetic, Thirty Years On
Uncomfortable Ethnographies: The Politics of Race and the Untimeliness of Critique
The promise of modernity’s drone-assisted conquest of air space is far from uncomplicated. As unmanned air vehicles become more ubiquitous, with implementations ranging from intelligence-gathering and covert military attacks to cultural production and everyday logistics, this special issue of Krisis captures the technical, aesthetic, economic, psychic, and political challenges facing the rise of the drone.
To invoke and provoke the everyday, Rob Stone opens the issue by bringing home the unease of displaced technologies through sonic imagination and biomimicry. Moving from patterned cacophonies to discursive shifts, Øyvind Vågnes evaluates the role of euphemism in shaping public perception of the so-called War On Terror. Alex Edney-Browne’s article tackles the prominent image of the drone operator as PlayStation killer head-on by questioning the assumption that the virtualization of violence yields a decrease in empathy, argues that mediation can also constitute feelings of proximity and stimulate peer-recognition. Halbe Kuipers’ article reflects on the metaphysical and ethical implications of image-making when drones participate in filmic world-making. A 2015 debate transcript follows, in which Krisis’s own Eva Sancho Rodriguez moderates a discussion between Willem Schinkel and Rogier van Reekum. The issue ends with two book reviews: Sigmund Bruno Schilpzand on Grégoire Chamayous’s A Theory of the Drone and Tobias Burgers on Ian Shaw’s Predator Empire: Drone Warfare and Full Spectrum Dominance.
The image is a fragment of Ruben Pater’s Drone Survival Guide
With contributions from:
Rob Stone, Øyvind Vågnes, Alex Edney-Browne, Halbe Kuipers, Rogier van Reekum, Willem Schinkel, Eva Sancho Rodriguez, Tobias Burgers and Sigmund Bruno Schilpzand